<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Will you still love me tomorrow?&#8221;: Charlotte Greig reconfigures girl groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feministmusicgeek.com/2009/08/04/will-you-still-love-me-tomorrow-charlotte-greig-reconfigures-girl-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://feministmusicgeek.com/2009/08/04/will-you-still-love-me-tomorrow-charlotte-greig-reconfigures-girl-groups/</link>
	<description>Feminist discourses in wax and plastic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Girl Groups, Girl Culture: Popular Music and Identity in the 1960s by Jacqueline Warwick &#171; Feminist Music Geek</title>
		<link>http://feministmusicgeek.com/2009/08/04/will-you-still-love-me-tomorrow-charlotte-greig-reconfigures-girl-groups/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Girl Groups, Girl Culture: Popular Music and Identity in the 1960s by Jacqueline Warwick &#171; Feminist Music Geek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministmusicgeek.com/?p=1103#comment-687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] covered, something I wish Charlotte Greig would have considered when penning her book on girl groups. While Greig truncates the history of the girl group era in order to broaden the definition of what [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] covered, something I wish Charlotte Greig would have considered when penning her book on girl groups. While Greig truncates the history of the girl group era in order to broaden the definition of what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.I.P., Ellie Greenwich &#171; Feminist Music Geek</title>
		<link>http://feministmusicgeek.com/2009/08/04/will-you-still-love-me-tomorrow-charlotte-greig-reconfigures-girl-groups/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R.I.P., Ellie Greenwich &#171; Feminist Music Geek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministmusicgeek.com/?p=1103#comment-377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as well as her male colleagues at the Brill Building, including her husband. As I mentioned in a review of Charlotte Greig&#8217;s Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?, Greenwich also had to negotiate the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as well as her male colleagues at the Brill Building, including her husband. As I mentioned in a review of Charlotte Greig&#8217;s Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?, Greenwich also had to negotiate the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregHorrorShow</title>
		<link>http://feministmusicgeek.com/2009/08/04/will-you-still-love-me-tomorrow-charlotte-greig-reconfigures-girl-groups/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregHorrorShow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministmusicgeek.com/?p=1103#comment-312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant article, enjoyed reading it. Shame the book sounds a little on the light side at 200 pages. Will RT now as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant article, enjoyed reading it. Shame the book sounds a little on the light side at 200 pages. Will RT now as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

